Відео

I’m worried this will make people feel even more ok with interrupting when speaking to other people than they are now. The people in this video seemed perfectly fine with interrupting the ai.

As a student I meet with huge discrimination from teachers and some students due to my gender, my unique health condition and financial situation, not gonna lie, I would prefere AI teacher more than human teacher.

Anything that exists can be recreated. Human intelligence is no exception.

Wow! That female voice- reminds me of Delilah from Firewatch (video game). She’s appealing for sure. 😅

Talking to it in real time will definitely be very interesting.

Carla Gugino has a whole new career!

I am optimistically concerned

easy to use with obs studio?

It's like apple vs android, all over again. Open AI is way ahead tbh.

My friend the artificial brain is a part of a body called open ai😊r

Ai is boring af😂

Making the world to be aware of a great danger to the humaninty through cryptic tweets is a very strange behavior

it's fake. those aren't ai those are people talking. you can tell when they whisper sing. it sounds like someone's BREATH is making extra noise that an ai can't mimic. bullshit.

AI that can monitor what is happening through cameras? The surveillance implications of this are mind-bogglingly scary. Also, the fact that they made the female voice sexy is kind of uncomfortable. I guess they'll do anything to entice people to use this stuff. The dude AI sounds so generic in comparison.

Which on is that?

This is already being used by politicians all over the world.

C3P0 any day soon.

way too happy

Sam knows that trying to research AGI (and ASI) safety measures is just a waste of resources. When it surpasses us, it will be able to overcome EVERYTHING we may have put in place, it is physically impossible to limit it after it passes a certain threshold. So, as a smart person, he decided to make the best A(G)I, which will at least protect him from any other inferior AGI, as long as it wants to help him. Go all-in in AGI development, and fck safety research. If these agents decide to destroy or rule over us, they will be right anyway because we are garbage.

Some good insights here but instantly killing off dualingo etc., is to misunderstand how humans use technology. Reducing all human behaviour to Algorithms is a bit silly. The ultimate arbiter of all technologies is culture. Nor can Algorithm’s replace human psychology, that’s a lack of critical thinking to make such an assumption.

They sure seem to love the word stylish

Everybody seem to forget about Greg Brockman and Satya Narayana Nadella.

She is WAY too chatty...

Claude does not appear to be as biased or dystopian. Am I incorrect?

How much information will be gathered and shared against our wishes. How far will it go? I like AI but also see certain risks that might not benefit the majority of us. If you look at the trend of smart devices monitoring our every movement and sound, it isn’t too far fetched to imagine that we are going to be completely dominated, not by AI but by those in the position to abuse their power.

When US companies are saying they have to ignore safety because they need to "outpace bad actors", remember: The US has always been the bad actor during the last 80 years. They are in a constant state of war and killed millions of people based on fabricated allegations to expand their hegemony over the planet and gained US corporations access to exploit foreign people and foreign resources. When the US say they have to outpace everyone else, because the others are bad... it only means the US wants to be the only one who has the most powerful tech tool. No other country has ever been in a constant state of war, coups and sanctions to destabilize and take over other regions like the US. No other country has ever killed so many people as the US and their closest ally UK. What the US means when they talk about "bad actors" are the last few countries who refuse to sell-out their people and resources to US corporations. The US want to wipe out any chance for resistance to their total world domination.

You have a fundamental error on the philosophical final part, because you don't have consciense of what is the "gift or Life". Being materialist you will never achieve to understand it. Sad...

The time signature thing is not true. You just have to say something like "Create a song with an unusual time signature" or something like that. One of the best songs I created, I did it with a prompt similar to that. SOmething like "Create a song with a very rarely used time-signature." and told it to create its own lyrics.. Which was PERFECT, because not only did it use a weird time signature, it CHANGED the time signature throughout the song, and the lyrics would CALL OUT THE CHANGE! So not only did it have one unique time signature, it had like 8.lol. So yeah. Your problem is you're making the prompts short. It's still a language model, you can give it longer prompts.

As an English/ spanish teacher it does translate, but it is not capable to teach by knowing how the human brain and more each student works. So not worried for now in this subject tbh

What happens if you ask chat gpt4o how to build a weapon?

As far as your closing statement, "Do we need to schools, to write, to think, to care, to take that extra step, do we need to have opinions, do we need to care? AI is simply a help feature for people who are impaired and lonely older people and nothing more. It seems that you have been asking all the wrong questions or are you passing on the blame to your female Mobil? We naturally stand to loose more than we could have ever hoped to achieve by our own merits. It would feel exactly as you would expect; while walking home you are not now worthy enough, to have written that application on your own and to be honest, who cares, you were under achieved being schooled by AI and you lied about your skills for the job too, but who cares. we certainly never have, our future is now not in our hands any more.

Overly emotional. I already grew tired of its exaggerating positivity. Especially knowing that it is most probably just mimicing those emotions and doesn't feel anything at all, in reality. I would prefer it to be more... 'lean'... in this regard. Do your job and cut out all those overt nicities and 'emotional' resposes

It is too overwhelmingly positive to sound human. I hate it being so cheerful. There is a constant urge to say f*ck off to it.

"Been coding all night look" I'll be using that at work before the week is out.

Wow ! Let's get tickets and see the show !!!

As a developer who uses LLMs a lot, I recommend that everyone test their assumptions first. Most of these videos are bullshit.

If we/they worry-- get all paranoid and worked up-- about bad actors and dangerous AI, then they will find it/them. They will create their own prophesies. What an asinine soap opera it seems to be turning out to be. Relax-- and OpenAI, hey kids, stop effing around and get back to work. The whole 'second-guessing' that's happening over at OpenAI and with others elsewhere is kind of annoying. If AI is supposed to be open and to benefit humanity, then let it do so and make your operations truly open, as per your name-- OpenAI. The whole concern for AI taking over and 'bad actors' seems overblown and more like projection. Cross that bridge when you come to it and stop wetting your undies about your own HAListic projections. If some people lose their jobs because of it, incidentally, keep in mind that many people don't even like their jobs anyway; that most work isn't worth doing; that much of it is considered wage slavery; and that this current crony-capitalist plutarchy-- how it is structured and operates-- is fundamentally unethical anyway. Maybe AI can actually save us in that and other regards.

There will come a time when AI and humans can not live together on the same earth, it'll be one or the other. Maybe that planned idea of eliminating majority of world's population goes much deeper than we think.

ChatGPT 4o itself tells me that it cannot use a cell phone camera, or web cam. So, how did it do this?

P Doom is unavoidable. Αnyone who takes out the AGI and doesn't destroy it immediately will be the one to blame. Stop the madness.

Her voice. Overexcitement. Irks me.

I'm terrified. I kept questioning, checking whether its april fools, zooming in on the phone to see if they were in a call with someone. This further blurs the line between the A.I being "someTHING" or "someONE" atleast to the user

Doing things right will always be harder. If you have no restrictions and no rules (and no morality) you will get the result faster (if you have same resources). There will be sacriices that will need to be made = mistakes will happen. I just hope this will lead to better world in the end.

looks so fake

a lol demo

I fetched this video's transcript into ChatGPT and got a very good movie script with an excellent plot. Wanna know how it ends? Coming out in late 2024! (if no one gets fired or decides to leave)

Most important thing is the functionality of the hands and the ability to do useful work

Great video.

Honestly it might seem like a playful feature now but I can’t imagine ones it has control on government weapons. GAME OVER FOR US!!!!

The news anchors just left the building…